MSI A55-G41 PC Mate (MS-7793)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7793
MotherboardMSI A55-G41 PC Mate (MS-7793)  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '22 at 18:41
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
44.1% Average
Memory 58.9
1-Core 63.3
2-Core 116
47% 79.3 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 160
23% 167 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 36CA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 22.5
Parallax 18.5
17% 20.7 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 17
17% 21.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD220 240GB-$33
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1031B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 30 26 30 27 34 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.9% Poor
Read 237
Write 37.4
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 30.2
21% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 1.6
50% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 88.6
DQ Write 48.2
DQ Mixed 6.2
21% 47.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 93%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
672GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 1 1.6 1 1.7 1.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 183
Write 0.7
Mixed 2
SusWrite 1.2
33% 46.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
65% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Dark-1600 Dark-1600 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
36.8% Below average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 15.6
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 11
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A55-G41 PC Mate (MS-7793) Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A55-G41 PC Mate (MS-7793)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 7% - Terrible Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback