Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 R5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 R5  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150401
Uptime7 Days
Run DateJul 20 '22 at 17:46
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 72.7
2-Core 124
58% 92.6 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 398
42% 334 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.7% Average
Lighting 62.3
Reflection 60
Parallax 80.4
51% 67.6 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 63.1
Splatting 44.4
44% 55.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 348 349 342 310 174 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 360
Write 418
Mixed 378
SusWrite 310
83% 367 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 42.4
135% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 148
131% 197 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
297GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 345 343 337 340 359 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 425
Mixed 416
SusWrite 343
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 67.3
4K Mixed 43.5
136% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 230
174% 235 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 93%
Great: 125%
HPT DISK 0_0 9TB
257GB free
Firmware: 4.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 51 62 63 64 67 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.7% Excellent
Read 236
Write 38
Mixed 104
SusWrite 56.3
81% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
166% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 115%
HPT DISK 0_2 6TB
908GB free
Firmware: 4.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 48 61 60 60 65 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.7% Good
Read 167
Write 117
Mixed 97.3
SusWrite 54.3
81% 109 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
211% 1.47 MB/s
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 167 167 168 168 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 148
Write 110
Mixed 74.4
SusWrite 165
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 114%
HPT DISK 0_1 1TB
577GB free
Firmware: 4.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 84 83 79 82 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 102
Write 96.8
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 83.9
70% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 78%
WD Purple 3TB (2014)-$79
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 132 133 133 134 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 125
Write 127
Mixed 66
SusWrite 132
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 85%
WD WD30EZRS-00J99B0 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 98 98 98 97 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 92.3
Write 90.1
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 96.9
66% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
47.6% Average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 16.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.3
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 R5 Builds (Compare 192 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 R5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $423
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback