HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory20.6 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '22 at 15:39
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 66.7
1-Core 74.7
2-Core 148
56% 96.6 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 564
51% 429 Pts
64-Core 863
53% 863 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
MSI(1462 328B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.9% Above average
Lighting 72.7
Reflection 77.8
Parallax 71.3
59% 73.9 fps
MRender 68.8
Gravity 74.3
Splatting 70.2
58% 71.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 226 215 218 218 218 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.6% Above average
Read 237
Write 199
Mixed 199
SusWrite 221
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 23
84% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 194
146% 195 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 124%
Mushkin Chronos 120GB-$70
110GB free
Firmware: 581A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 81 76 84 84 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.2% Average
Read 206
Write 102
Mixed 141
SusWrite 81.6
30% 133 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 28.7
95% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 86.9
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 79.7
65% 90.9 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
460GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 96 94 95 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 97.7
Write 92.9
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 94.5
63% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 68%
Toshiba MG03SCA200 2TB
469GB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 103 101 102 103 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 139
Write 128
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 102
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 58GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 19.9
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback