Foxconn H61MXP

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago.

Motherboard	Foxconn H61MXP (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120618
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 18 '22 at 17:28
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3550-$335 23,599 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Memory 84 1-Core 96.7 2-Core 192 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 371 8-Core 366 49% 368 Pts	64-Core 369 23% 369 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3732) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.8% Poor	Lighting 37.6 Reflection 47.5 Parallax 38.2 31% 41.1 fps	MRender 40.7 Gravity 38.9 Splatting 27.1 28% 35.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$36 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF430400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 144 131 95 135 141 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.9% Below average	Read 213 Write 195 Mixed 122 SusWrite 130 37% 165 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 8.3 4K Mixed 14.8 46% 12.8 MB/s	DQ Read 18.2 DQ Write 20 DQ Mixed 11.6 11% 16.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 227GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 131 137 139 138 139 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Read 120 Write 131 Mixed 74 SusWrite 132 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1 225% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 109%
General UDisk 4GB 5,358 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 0GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 21.2 Write 9.5 Mixed 4.3 12% 11.7 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 27% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 78.B1GEP.CFZ0C 017A 78.B1GEP.CP00C 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.7% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 15.1 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 14.3 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 73.5 54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61MXP Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H61MXP

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	6x
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples	6x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	5x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	6x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	4x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	3x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $36Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
IND-S325S/120G 120GBBench 51%, 248 samples	2x

RAM
78.B1GEP.CFZ0C 017A 78.B1GEP.CP00C 8GBUnknownBench 46%, 4 samples	3x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	2x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $95

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16