Casper NIRVANA NB F650 GOLD(F650.8250-4T45T-G TURKCELL)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemCasper NIRVANA NB F650 GOLD(F650.8250-4T45T-G TURKCELL)  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER F15KR 001
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180330
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 18 '22 at 14:03
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 14%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 70.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 206
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 543
55% 446 Pts
64-Core 425
26% 425 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Device(1B0A 233C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6292
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
6.41% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 7.6
6% 8.87 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 7
Splatting 11.2
8% 9.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.41%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 107 92 95 93 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 387
Write 154
Mixed 275
SusWrite 123
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 14.7
100% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 191
169% 253 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4SFS824A.C8FF Kingston 9905711-038.A00G 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.4% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 12.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 15.2
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NIRVANA NB F650 GOLD(F650.8250-4T45T-G TURKCELL) Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NB F650 GOLD(F650.8250-4T45T-G TURKCELL)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback