Performance Results

Gaming 142%
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 127%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics168% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A38
MotherboardMSI B350M PRO-VDH (MS-7A38)  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180424
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJul 18 '22 at 02:33
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 90.8
1-Core 114
2-Core 232
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 682
68% 554 Pts
64-Core 887
55% 887 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$449
Gigabyte(1458 408E) ≥ 4GB; GV-N307TAORUS M-8GD
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
168% Outstanding
Lighting 251
Reflection 221
Parallax 218
204% 230 fps
MRender 255
Gravity 168
Splatting 133
146% 185 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 168%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$45
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 14 19 76 101 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 446
Write 376
Mixed 244
SusWrite 82.4
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 18.5
66% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 34.4
DQ Mixed 28.2
33% 58.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
304GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 159 161 158 159 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 140
Write 124
Mixed 90.7
SusWrite 158
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3600 MHz clocked @ 1800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 51
MC Write 47
MC Mixed 42.6
134% 46.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 44.3
SC Mixed 35
101% 35.3 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 127%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B350M PRO-VDH (MS-7A38) Builds (Compare 1,152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 28%
Desktop 77%
Workstation 26%

Motherboard: MSI B350M PRO-VDH (MS-7A38) - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $438
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback