Today's hottest deals

Microsoft Surface Pro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicrosoft Surface Pro  (all builds)
MotherboardMicrosoft Surface Pro
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2736 x 1824 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 16 '22 at 07:48
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7660U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 92.8
2-Core 155
59% 103 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 230
29% 220 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 640 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Microsoft(1414 0026) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
8.96% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 11.7
9% 10.6 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 11.4
9% 11.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.96%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung KUS040202M-B000 512GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXY8AM1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 551 266 191 139 118 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 598
Write 590
Mixed 410
SusWrite 229
102% 457 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 75
4K Mixed 52.8
170% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 866
DQ Write 466
DQ Mixed 579
454% 637 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 121%
Great: 170%
SDXC Card 512GB
178GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 77
Write 14.5
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 14.4
33% 31.9 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 3.3
235% 5.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 45%
H/W DISK 1 1.5TB
84GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 70 69 68 68 68 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.7% Poor
Read 58.2
Write 31.9
Mixed 44.1
SusWrite 68.1
68% 50.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 36%
H/W DISK 2 2TB
157GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 3.1 2.8 1.5 0.1 3.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 93.2
Write 61.8
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 2.9
49% 44.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
34% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 41%
H/W DISK 3 2TB
857GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 68 68 67 68 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 87
Write 105
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 66.5
105% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 44%
H/W DISK 4 8TB
4TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 1.8 1.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23% Poor
Read 50.2
Write 104
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 2.1
78% 55.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.5
187% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9CCNNNCLGALAR-NUD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 49.5
MC Mixed 21.8
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 19.1
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Surface Pro Builds (Compare 2,432 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Microsoft Surface Pro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback