Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2697 V4 196 User benchmarks, average bench 75% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	77.7% Very good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 109 2-Core 205 76% 133 Pts	4-Core 379 8-Core 710 65% 545 Pts	64-Core 2,088 129% 2,088 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 5 Volume 400GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 270GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 42 42 43 44 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 432 Write 34.6 Mixed 84 SusWrite 43.6 32% 148 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 14 4K Mixed 8 33% 10.7 MB/s	DQ Read 103 DQ Write 163 DQ Mixed 119 94% 128 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 104%
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30013 2TB 2,028 User benchmarks, average bench 459% 757GB free Firmware: SU6SM001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2024 2089 2060 1598 1998 2041 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	192% Outstanding	Read 779 Write 976 Mixed 1,842 SusWrite 1,968 318% 1,391 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 66.7 4K Mixed 28.6 102% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 165 DQ Write 249 DQ Mixed 157 133% 190 MB/s
Poor: 277% ↑ This bench: 192% Great: 604%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1K43DB2-CWE 8x8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 146% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB RIMM DDR4 2000 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	145% Outstanding	MC Read 66.3 MC Write 56 MC Mixed 54 168% 58.8 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 19 SC Mixed 19.1 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 145% Great: 247%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 98%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
SSDSC2BB150G7 150GBIntelBench 52%, 328 samples	20x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	11x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x

RAM
M393A1K43DB2-CWE 8x8GBSamsungBench 146%, 50 samples	6x
SP008GXLZU320BSA 4x8GBSilicon-PowerBench 99%, 50 samples	6x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,230 samples	5x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $989