HP Laptop 15s-fq1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15s-fq1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86C9
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220309
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 15 '22 at 21:48
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 115
2-Core 205
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 249
36% 264 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
HP(103C 86C9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7926
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
6.23% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 8.5
6% 7.1 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 10
7% 8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.23%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDHBA256TCK-1AS1AABHA 256GB
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0V23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 770 960 974 354 441 226 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,166
Write 1013
Mixed 823
SusWrite 621
203% 906 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 66.7
4K Mixed 49
164% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 790
DQ Write 803
DQ Mixed 774
588% 789 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 171%
Great: 187%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8HJ-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
45.8% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 12.1
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 11.2
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15s-fq1xxx Builds (Compare 1,014 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15s-fq1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback