NTT MS-7514

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNTT MS-7514  (all builds)
MotherboardMICRO-STAR P45 Neo3 (MS-7514)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '22 at 20:57
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
42.2% Average
Memory 65.6
1-Core 30.6
2-Core 61.7
36% 52.6 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 117
15% 114 Pts
64-Core 118
7% 118 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Gigabyte(1458 3505) 1GB
CLim: 730 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
3.39% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 1.4
3% 4.23 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 3.4
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.39%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFME1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 95 82 85 85 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28% Poor
Read 148
Write 92.5
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 86.4
23% 102 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 13.7
52% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 13.6
DQ Write 21.5
DQ Mixed 17
13% 17.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
436GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 93 96 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
62% Good
Read 125
Write 122
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 90.3
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
226% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
536GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 96 96 103 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 120
Write 117
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 97.5
73% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
221GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 96 96 103 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 144
Write 153
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 97.7
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 103%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
135GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 85 92 93 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 104
Write 99
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 88
65% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 4.8
15% 5.33 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7514 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: NTT MS-7514

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $176
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback