Lenovo 82Q7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 82Q7  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2160 x 1350 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220512
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 15 '22 at 19:48
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 146
2-Core 284
90% 168 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 595
66% 523 Pts
64-Core 596
37% 596 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 382F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 18.7
16% 18.4 fps
MRender 15.5
Gravity 26.1
Splatting 10.2
14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ256HBJD-00BL2 256GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L2QFXM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1047 1100 1111 200 200 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 1,182
Write 1,126
Mixed 1,008
SusWrite 643
222% 990 MB/s
4K Read 59.1
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 84.2
292% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 834
DQ Write 1025
DQ Mixed 812
645% 890 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 218%
Great: 206%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CMR6N-XN 1x8GB
1 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
49.6% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 13.9
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 15.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 91.4
44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82Q7 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82Q7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback