Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 237%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 255%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics219% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive459% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory55.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220512
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 15 '22 at 14:39
Run Duration435 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 177
2-Core 353
111% 208 Pts
4-Core 691
8-Core 1,186
114% 938 Pts
64-Core 2,234
138% 2,234 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 111%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$580
Nvidia(10DE 1535) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Lighting 342
Reflection 317
Parallax 351
279% 337 fps
MRender 211
Gravity 285
Splatting 199
187% 232 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 219%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
838GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3801 3864 3886 3855 3869 3852 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
459% Outstanding
Read 2,138
Write 3,608
Mixed 2,269
SusWrite 3,854
675% 2,967 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 84
288% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,304
DQ Write 899
DQ Mixed 1,098
821% 1,101 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 459%
Great: 486%
Pm981a NVMe Samsung 1024GB
568GB free
Firmware: 15302129 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1874 1739 1672 1667 1667 1627 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
345% Outstanding
Read 2,530
Write 1,881
Mixed 1,768
SusWrite 1,708
442% 1,972 MB/s
4K Read 64.1
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 86.5
283% 97.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,301
DQ Write 989
DQ Mixed 1,101
835% 1,130 MB/s
Poor: 146%
This bench: 345%
Great: 357%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
95GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,846
Write 11,062
Mixed 9,570
2,206% 9,826 MB/s
4K Read 706
4K Write 535
4K Mixed 569
2,081% 603 MB/s
DQ Read 1,742
DQ Write 1,345
DQ Mixed 1,480
1,125% 1,523 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
368GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 459 456 457 457 456 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 452
Mixed 404
SusWrite 458
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 54.5
180% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 219
164% 220 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 114%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
411GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 508
Write 452
Mixed 403
101% 454 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 45.6
154% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 218
164% 221 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Series 500GB
418GB free
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 330
Write 310
Mixed 193
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 30.2
118% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 62.7
87% 159 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 89%
WD WD101EFAX-68LDBN0 10TB
3TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 182
Write 195
Mixed 99.8
117% 159 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 1.5
368% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 119%
WD WD101EFAX-68LDBN0 10TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 106
Write 123
Mixed 74.5
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 1.3
335% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 119%
SAMSUNG SSD PM851 2.5 7m 256GB
238GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 252
Write 245
Mixed 189
288% 229 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 31.9
4K Mixed 19.8
1,829% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 20.8
DQ Write 37.1
DQ Mixed 22
2,087% 26.6 MB/s
SAMSUNG SSD SM841N 2.5 7 256GB
56GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 50 59 148 245 178 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
154% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 103
Mixed 161
SusWrite 126
184% 139 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 32.3
4K Mixed 22.2
1,899% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 19.7
DQ Write 37.5
DQ Mixed 23.1
2,134% 26.8 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 154%
Great: 174%
WD My Book Duo 25F6 320GB
293GB free, PID 25f6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 225
Write 226
Mixed 117
234% 189 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
136% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLM16G40C18U4B.M8FB1 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
137% Outstanding
MC Read 59.9
MC Write 46.4
MC Mixed 46.6
146% 51 GB/s
SC Read 33.3
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 45
101% 35.4 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 137%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,048 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $1,281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback