MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 137%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 129%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics141% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B51
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)  (all builds)
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191226
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateJul 14 '22 at 17:56
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 140
2-Core 281
94% 171 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 1,042
96% 802 Pts
64-Core 1,042
64% 1,042 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 98%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2340 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Lighting 199
Reflection 197
Parallax 182
162% 193 fps
MRender 213
Gravity 150
Splatting 133
131% 165 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 141%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900J13
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 382
Write 421
Mixed 362
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 78.1
4K Mixed 35.4
132% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 186
166% 246 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 91%
Seagate OneTouch SSD 500GB
119GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 123 137 135 142 133 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.6% Poor
Read 225
Write 118
Mixed 126
SusWrite 130
33% 150 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 5.8
30% 8.97 MB/s
DQ Read 70.5
DQ Write 9.4
DQ Mixed 16.6
18% 32.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 58%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
34GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,329
Write 859
Mixed 817
221% 1,002 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 68
237% 85.4 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 839
DQ Mixed 340
330% 505 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 209%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB
183GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 162 163 159 156 158 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 155
Mixed 110
SusWrite 159
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 0.7
280% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 102%
WD easystore 2647 1TB
866GB free, PID 2647
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 38 39 39 38 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 35.7
Write 36.1
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 38.1
48% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 1
255% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 01BA 8GBF1X08LFHH35-12-K 029E CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 01BA 8GBF1X08LFHH35-12-K 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 25.6
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 25.5
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) Builds (Compare 22,975 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $860
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback