Asus PRO A320M-R WI-FI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 133%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRO A320M-R WI-FI  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '22 at 15:37
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 73.9
1-Core 143
2-Core 287
90% 168 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 863
87% 705 Pts
64-Core 1,127
70% 1,127 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 88%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Zotac(19DA 8617) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Lighting 228
Reflection 214
Parallax 204
186% 215 fps
MRender 199
Gravity 156
Splatting 138
132% 164 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 154%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 480GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XA003R17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 420 424 427 426 428 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 426
Mixed 384
SusWrite 424
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 99
4K Mixed 39.2
145% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 223
171% 229 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 99%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
261GB free
Firmware: AX0R2J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 88 88 88 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 103
Write 104
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 87.8
60% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 23.8
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 29
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 69%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRO A320M-R WI-FI Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRO A320M-R WI-FI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $445
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback