| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Intel X79 (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191015 |
| Uptime | 2.5 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 13 '22 at 08:30 |
| Run Duration | 227 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 68% |
PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
46.9%
Average
|
43% 68.1 Pts
|
28% 229 Pts
|
28% 458 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.3%
Poor
|
27% 33.5 fps
|
22% 28.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Apacer AS340 120GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN05999
|
61% 273 MB/s
|
66% 22.2 MB/s
|
74% 126 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
86GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 98 98 98 98 98 MB/s
|
57.7%
Above average
|
66% 90.7 MB/s
|
134% 0.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4A 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
39.2%
Below average
|
42% 14.7 GB/s
|
21% 7.43 GB/s
|
34% 119 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,992 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Intel X79
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 339x |
| Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 272x |
| Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples | 145x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 126x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 115x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 110x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $158 |