Asus ROG STRIX Z390-H GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics93.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-H GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200527
Uptime12.1 Days
Run DateJul 12 '22 at 23:13
Run Duration286 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 87.2
1-Core 122
2-Core 241
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 903
82% 692 Pts
64-Core 916
57% 916 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.9% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 126
Parallax 119
96% 121 fps
MRender 93.6
Gravity 121
Splatting 110
89% 108 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$35
325GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 983 846 844 841 801 689 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 1,927
Write 1,805
Mixed 1,578
SusWrite 834
344% 1,536 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 58.7
202% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,158
DQ Write 805
DQ Mixed 972
728% 978 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 234%
Great: 284%
WDC WD40EZAZ-19SF3B0 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 152 152 151 151 151 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 187
Write 164
Mixed 102
SusWrite 151
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 11.2
4K Mixed 1
70% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 1.5
DQ Write 12.5
DQ Mixed 1.4
3% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 38%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
240GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 116 116 117 116 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 177
Write 99.3
Mixed 85.8
SusWrite 116
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 101%
Apacer AS350 1TB
466GB free
Firmware: APMB001K
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 427 413 402 398 402 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 68% Great: 73%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
21GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 42 43 42 43 43 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 41.1
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 41.8
54% 39 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 20%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
2GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 36.9
Write 40.8
Mixed 31.2
47% 36.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
53.6% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 15.3
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 17.2
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-H GAMING Builds (Compare 3,752 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-H GAMING - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $725
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback