HP ENVY x360 Convertible 13-y0XX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 93% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemHP ENVY x360 Convertible 13-y0XX  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82B7
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200629
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJul 12 '22 at 16:04
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
CPU Throttled 93%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 105
2-Core 174
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 6
8-Core 259
12% 133 Pts
64-Core 24.9
2% 24.9 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 82B7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
2.65% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 3
Parallax 3.3
2% 3.07 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 4.5
3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.65%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5256GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5KHA4101 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 553
Write 580
Mixed 496
121% 543 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 15.7
86% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 594
DQ Write 29.5
DQ Mixed 379
259% 334 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 141%
Seagate BUP Ultra Touch 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 116 119 121 122 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 106
Write 115
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 119
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 70%
Seagate One Touch HDD 5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 115 104 102 101 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 93.9
Write 118
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 107
71% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.6
146% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 68%
Seagate FreeAgent 1TB
636GB free, PID 3001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 34 32 34 34 32 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 28.9
Write 11.7
Mixed 18.9
SusWrite 32
30% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 20%
Inateck 1TB
164GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 68 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
30% Poor
Read 67.7
Write 50
Mixed 42.4
SusWrite 67.9
76% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30%
Great: 146%
Inateck 512GB
238GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 165 173 163 171 172 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 208
Mixed 155
SusWrite 167
243% 178 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 25.4
4K Mixed 16.1
1,448% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 17.2
DQ Write 35.7
DQ Mixed 21.2
1,999% 24.7 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 143%
Great: 167%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4EBE304EB-EGCF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
59.8% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 19.8
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 18.9
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY x360 Convertible 13-y0XX Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY x360 Convertible 13-y0XX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback