Fujitsu 0000000000

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive98.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemFujitsu 0000000000  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3812-A1
Memory122.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '20 at 18:57
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$430
CPU1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 85.3
1-Core 160
2-Core 315
100% 187 Pts
4-Core 627
8-Core 1,212
109% 919 Pts
64-Core 2057
127% 2057 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 301 255 205 171 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 484
Mixed 452
SusWrite 231
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 36.7
160% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 247
212% 313 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 128%
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
858GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1613 1627 1630 1637 545 612 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
279% Outstanding
Read 1,816
Write 1,635
Mixed 1,333
SusWrite 1,277
340% 1,515 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 80.1
262% 92.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,060
DQ Write 1,032
DQ Mixed 419
487% 837 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 279%
Great: 311%
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00-1016 1TB
890GB free
Firmware: 10200016
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1872 1402 1398 1395 1396 1394 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
294% Outstanding
Read 1,935
Write 2204
Mixed 1,708
SusWrite 1,476
413% 1,831 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 68.5
238% 89.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,324
DQ Write 1,075
DQ Mixed 1,174
886% 1,191 MB/s
Poor: 242%
This bench: 294%
Great: 314%
Inateck 512GB
314GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 41.5
Write 40.2
Mixed 41
SusWrite 43.1
57% 41.4 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 19.7
4K Mixed 15.1
1,222% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 12.8
DQ Write 20.8
DQ Mixed 15.9
1,296% 16.5 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 167%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A4G43AB2-CVF 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 36.8
MC Mixed 29.5
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 40.7
SC Mixed 29
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 0000000000 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu 0000000000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $53
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback