HP p6-2078itm

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p6-2078itm  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ABF
Memory4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '22 at 11:24
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$170
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 78.1
1-Core 85.5
2-Core 136
61% 99.8 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 219
29% 219 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6350
MSI(1462 2133) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1045.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.09% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 1.7
1% 1.83 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
881GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 236 235 237 230 228 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
69.5% Good
Read 198
Write 234
Mixed 224
SusWrite 231
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 39.2
122% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 134
119% 179 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ20UF8BCF0-DJ-F Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 16.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback