Asus Pro B660M-C D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Pro B660M-C D4  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '22 at 20:15
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G7400
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 157
2-Core 287
95% 175 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 387
52% 387 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.100.9833
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
4.56% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 5.6
4% 6.1 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 6.7
6% 7.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.56%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1362 403 398 405 409 408 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 2,316
Write 2230
Mixed 1,497
SusWrite 564
369% 1,652 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 81.1
283% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,001
DQ Write 1,428
DQ Mixed 1,152
889% 1,194 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 269%
Great: 302%
WDC WD40EZAZ-00SF3B0 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 136 136 137 133 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 146
Write 131
Mixed 106
SusWrite 136
29% 130 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 1.1
20% 6.93 MB/s
DQ Read 1.4
DQ Write 11.5
DQ Mixed 2.4
3% 5.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G4DFD832A.M16FB 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61.6% Good
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 19.5
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 21.7
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro B660M-C D4 Builds (Compare 160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus Pro B660M-C D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 204% - Outstanding Total price: $68
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback