Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-K R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180913
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 11 '22 at 18:59
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 93.6
1-Core 132
2-Core 260
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 729
72% 586 Pts
64-Core 884
55% 884 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 88%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3995 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.9% Below average
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 157
Parallax 109
0% 88.6 fps
MRender 163
Gravity 95.1
Splatting 86.6
90% 115 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ccboot iSCSI 64GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 3.2 6.1 3.9 5 4.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 45
Write 13.8
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 4.1
15% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 4.4
752% 4.5 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 34%
Ccboot iSCSI 2TB
300GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 7.3 11 8.2 9.7 6.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
20% Very poor
Read 59.2
Write 6.2
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 7.9
19% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 3.9
685% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 20%
Great: 38%
Ccboot iSCSI 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 8.6 12 8.8 11 6.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 19.2
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 9.2
13% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 3.7
545% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 22.1
76% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 24.7
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H310M-K R2.0 Builds (Compare 7,170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback