Lenovo 10FM001UUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10FM001UUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 30D0
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220422
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '22 at 05:57
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 66.9
1-Core 80.1
2-Core 126
55% 91 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 306
34% 269 Pts
64-Core 287
18% 287 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Legend(17AA 30D0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.84% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 6.8
5% 6.83 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 0.3
4% 5.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.84%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LH512HALU-000H1 512GB
450GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 387 402 405 408 408 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 408
Write 409
Mixed 384
SusWrite 405
91% 402 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 58.5
4K Mixed 47.9
134% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 335
252% 338 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 125%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
23GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 11 11 11 12 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 96.7
Write 12.5
Mixed 27
SusWrite 11.8
36% 37 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1.5
101% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
66.6% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 23.5
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10FM001UUS Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10FM001UUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback