ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 10FM001UUS

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago.

System	Lenovo 10FM001UUS (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 30D0
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220422
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '22 at 04:41
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500T 9,313 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Memory 80.8 1-Core 92.7 2-Core 181 68% 118 Pts	4-Core 351 8-Core 343 47% 347 Pts	64-Core 339 21% 339 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) 188,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 30D0) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	4.7% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 6.9 Parallax 7 5% 6.63 fps	MRender 12 Gravity 6.1 Splatting 0.2 4% 6.1 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.7% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LH512HALU-000H1 512GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 447GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 420 369 388 395 405 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 483 Write 405 Mixed 378 SusWrite 397 93% 416 MB/s	4K Read 43.3 4K Write 94.3 4K Mixed 57.8 190% 65.1 MB/s	DQ Read 347 DQ Write 288 DQ Mixed 314 236% 317 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 125%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 23GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 11 11 12 12 11 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	Read 162 Write 12.5 Mixed 27.1 SusWrite 11.8 47% 53.3 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 1.6 113% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 2x8GB 5,035 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.5% Good	MC Read 23.6 MC Write 29.5 MC Mixed 24.6 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 14.9 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 79.1 51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical 10FM001UUS Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10FM001UUS

CPU
Core i5-6500TIntelBench 61%, 9,313 samples	32x
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	2x
Core i7-6700TIntelBench 70%, 9,225 samples	2x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	37x
HD 510 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 3%, 16,316 samples	1x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7LN256HCHP-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 81%, 7,649 samples	4x
LCH-256V2S 256GBLiteonBench 78%, 2,710 samples	3x
KingFast 512GBBench 79%, 3,625 samples	2x

RAM
M471A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 38%, 15,437 samples	5x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	4x
16ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 2x8GBMicronBench 71%, 5,035 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback