Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220516
Uptime9.8 Days
Run DateJul 11 '22 at 01:47
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5095A
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
46.9% Average
Memory 42.4
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 135
46% 83.2 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 292
40% 295 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1660
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.06% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 2.9
2% 3.27 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 0.1
2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.06%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Shiji 512GB 512GB
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 312 302 290 293 307 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 347
Write 325
Mixed 276
SusWrite 302
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 15.7
49% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 181
145% 198 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3733 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (96th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.5% Above average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 25.3
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.2
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 191
21% 191 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 3% 34 17 5 60 15.5" 1536 864 CMN1512
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,716 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback