Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 163% UFO	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 183% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	161% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210810
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 10 '22 at 17:07
Run Duration	241 Seconds
Run User	BOL-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$245 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Memory 84.4 1-Core 171 2-Core 341 106% 199 Pts	4-Core 663 8-Core 1,203 112% 933 Pts	64-Core 2285 141% 2285 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479 218,061 User benchmarks, average bench 158% Asus(1043 8813) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59 Performing below potential (61^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	161% Outstanding	Lighting 236 Reflection 212 Parallax 210 192% 219 fps	MRender 257 Gravity 160 Splatting 129 143% 182 fps
Poor: 139% ↑ This bench: 161% Great: 170%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS1000G 1TB 18,978 User benchmarks, average bench 178% 679GB free (System drive) Firmware: S8B40103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1460 1512 1582 1574 1598 546 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	218% Outstanding	Read 1,161 Write 1,463 Mixed 886 SusWrite 1,378 276% 1222 MB/s	4K Read 44.3 4K Write 160 4K Mixed 25.6 185% 76.8 MB/s	DQ Read 562 DQ Write 998 DQ Mixed 454 436% 671 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 218% Great: 246%
Kingdian N480 240GB 355 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 13GB free Firmware: R0726B Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 459 Write 333 Mixed 234 76% 342 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 51.6 4K Mixed 26.1 107% 36.1 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 92.3 DQ Mixed 17.5 46% 101 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 123%
Kingston SUV400S37480G 480GB 232 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1GB free Firmware: 3202 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 22.4 Write 23.9 Mixed 23.1 5% 23.1 MB/s	4K Read 10.3 4K Write 11.1 4K Mixed 10.2 34% 10.5 MB/s	DQ Read 11.4 DQ Write 13.3 DQ Mixed 11.7 9% 12.1 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 79%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 131 132 136 134 133 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Read 92 Write 103 Mixed 68.2 SusWrite 132 73% 99 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 90%
Toshiba HDWL110 1TB 7,333 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 231GB free Firmware: JU000A SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 88 88 88 88 83 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Read 135 Write 134 Mixed 49.3 SusWrite 87.4 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.6 234% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 79%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 88GB free Firmware: 2AR10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 13 13 43 64 63 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 9.7 Write 12.7 Mixed 6.5 SusWrite 36 12% 16.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 59%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 316GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 66 67 66 67 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	Read 71.6 Write 77.4 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 66 51% 69.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 131% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 59%
Sony Hard Drive 1.5TB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1TB free, PID 05bf Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 81 82 82 81 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Read 89.1 Write 83.1 Mixed 34.7 SusWrite 81.5 95% 72.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.5 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M1Z3600C18 1x16GB 1,070 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	65.1% Good	MC Read 24.4 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 21 64% 22.3 GB/s	SC Read 23 SC Write 22.7 SC Mixed 21.8 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 72.7 55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,929 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $175

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $206Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,661x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $189Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,290x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,428x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,247x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,084x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,473x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,841x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,107x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	868x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	772x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	729x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $128Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $1,010

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16