Asus G75VW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive88.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemAsus G75VW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G75VW
Memory20.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '22 at 04:03
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3720QM-$100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 94.9
2-Core 186
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 468
49% 393 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670M
Asus(1043 2119) 3GB
CLim: 620 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 12.4
Reflection 16
Parallax 11.7
10% 13.4 fps
MRender 16.3
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 11.5
11% 13.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$66
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 347 349 351 353 351 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 441
Write 398
Mixed 298
SusWrite 350
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 31.1
106% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 264
227% 334 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 130%
Sandisk 3.2 Gen 1 494GB
244GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 107 75 69 72 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 313
Write 138
Mixed 127
SusWrite 82.8
36% 165 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 17.7
4K Mixed 6.4
36% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 59.9
DQ Mixed 10
28% 60.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 8C26 TIMETEC-SD3-1600 EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 8C26 TIMETEC-SD3-1600 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.8% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 18.2
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18.1
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G75VW Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G75VW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback