Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	0.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 91 1-Core 85.9 2-Core 172 69% 116 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 323 44% 330 Pts	64-Core 328 20% 328 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 3525) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.88% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 0.3 1% 0.6 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.4 1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.88% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 123GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3Z40107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 191 55 83 56 48 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.5% Below average	Read 248 Write 230 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 101 34% 152 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 12.9 4K Mixed 4.8 43% 12.4 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 1.3 53% 127 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 6GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	42.3% Average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 13 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 13.2 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 65.8 61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	90x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	77x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	47x

RAM
HMT41GU6DFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 2,722 samples	43x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	33x
16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 53%, 7,464 samples	19x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $480

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16