Haiercomputer 7G-Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHaiercomputer 7G-Series  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta JWU
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140508
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateJul 09 '22 at 14:01
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4010U-$280
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
43.9% Average
Memory 66.9
1-Core 48.1
2-Core 86.6
43% 67.2 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 121
16% 122 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Quanta(152D 1017) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.32% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 6
Parallax 4.6
2% 4.37 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.5
3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.32%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ASU800SS-240GT-IT-B 240GB
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 219 223 216 223 230 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.7% Good
Read 220
Write 216
Mixed 208
SusWrite 218
49% 216 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 34
112% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 174
135% 184 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 118%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
282GB free
Firmware: GG2OAC90
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 72 70 72 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 77.8
Write 73.5
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 71.1
46% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.3% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 13.3
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7G-Series Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Haiercomputer 7G-Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback