Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics36% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive178% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X470 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210329
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '22 at 10:56
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 80.9
1-Core 147
2-Core 291
93% 173 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 982
86% 732 Pts
64-Core 1,484
92% 1,484 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36% Below average
Lighting 41.7
Reflection 24.7
Parallax 98.8
34% 55.1 fps
MRender 25.9
Gravity 72.9
Splatting 46.6
40% 48.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 36%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
252GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 847 635 601 382 331 422 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 1263
Write 1,179
Mixed 1,317
SusWrite 536
241% 1,074 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 21
158% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,186
DQ Write 1,052
DQ Mixed 1,103
831% 1,114 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 178%
Great: 340%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
408GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 136 129 81 72 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 128
Write 127
Mixed 96.1
SusWrite 107
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
243% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
423GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 155 148 93 82 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 175
Write 158
Mixed 73.1
SusWrite 122
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 170 161 105 90 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 170
Write 178
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 135
91% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.6
159% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 36.8
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 38
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 666 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $778
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback