HP ProDesk 400 G3 MT

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

22 months ago, 22 months ago.

System	HP ProDesk 400 G3 MT (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8061
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1882 x 1058 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160531
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 09 '22 at 02:06
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	PAN-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6100T-$108 6,076 User benchmarks, average bench 58% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Memory 85.2 1-Core 96.4 2-Core 168 69% 116 Pts	4-Core 241 8-Core 258 33% 250 Pts	64-Core 254 16% 254 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% EVGA(3842 2711) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.58% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 4.5 4% 4.43 fps	MRender 4.4 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5.1 4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.58% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKJ1A3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 436 417 416 427 434 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	97% Outstanding	Read 364 Write 419 Mixed 348 SusWrite 420 88% 388 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 89.1 4K Mixed 41.5 142% 52.6 MB/s	DQ Read 238 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 191 171% 253 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 97% Great: 100%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 298GB free Firmware: 03.03E03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 99 100 102 102 102 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Read 90.9 Write 79.8 Mixed 62 SusWrite 99.8 61% 83.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 58%
5 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 1302 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 5.7 6.3 6.1 6.1 6 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	6.16% Terrible	Read 20.4 Write 6 Mixed 7.3 SusWrite 5.7 11% 9.85 MB/s	4K Read 8.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 31% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 6.16% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264AZ-2G3B1 2x4GB 3,242 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	61.8% Good	MC Read 22.8 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 19.3 61% 21.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 22.4 SC Mixed 20.3 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ProDesk 400 G3 MT Builds (Compare 1,126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G3 MT

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	644x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	263x
Core i3-6100Intel $51Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	125x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	465x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	50x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	48x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	41x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $79Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	23x

RAM
M378A5143DB0-CPB 2x4GBSamsungBench 69%, 2,652 samples	52x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 16,202 samples	39x
HMA451U6AFR8N-TF 2x4GBHynixBench 68%, 8,569 samples	36x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $95

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16