Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1750 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 08 '22 at 20:49
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 172
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 617
54% 461 Pts
64-Core 617
38% 617 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 1807 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.7% Below average
Lighting 39.8
Reflection 54.4
Parallax 41.9
32% 45.4 fps
MRender 40.3
Gravity 42.2
Splatting 30.8
30% 37.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
325GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1611 1636 1060 1022 707 513 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 1600
Write 1,683
Mixed 1256
SusWrite 1,092
317% 1,408 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 76.2
254% 87.4 MB/s
DQ Read 766
DQ Write 901
DQ Mixed 348
397% 672 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 247%
Great: 277%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
922GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 172 172 172 172 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 170
Mixed 104
SusWrite 172
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 37.7
MC Mixed 30.8
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 31.8
SC Mixed 24.7
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback