Medion Erazer P6661 MD60303

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion Erazer P6661 MD60303  (all builds)
MotherboardMedion D15SHN
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160523
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJul 08 '22 at 19:16
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
43.6% Average
Memory 44.7
1-Core 74
2-Core 153
49% 90.7 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 246
33% 245 Pts
64-Core 246
15% 246 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Device(1B0A 2281) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7158
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
5.74% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 7.1
5% 6.23 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 10.3
7% 8.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.74%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S10C-128G-PHISON-SSD 128GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 75 79 83 67 82 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.5% Below average
Read 255
Write 172
Mixed 105
SusWrite 79.4
34% 153 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 14.9
60% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 96.2
DQ Write 96.2
DQ Mixed 86.2
68% 92.9 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 88%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100M 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 103 106 105 108 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 100
Write 105
Mixed 35
SusWrite 106
63% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 Hynix HMT41GS6DFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 19.1
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 16.3
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 181
22% 181 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Erazer P6661 MD60303 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Medion Erazer P6661 MD60303

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback