Aftershock NH50_70RA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics43.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAftershock NH50_70RA  (all builds)
MotherboardAftershock NH50_70RA
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190302
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 08 '22 at 16:32
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 88.6
1-Core 120
2-Core 237
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 734
74% 599 Pts
64-Core 967
60% 967 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 8560) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1659
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.2% Average
Lighting 55.7
Reflection 59
Parallax 50.8
45% 55.2 fps
MRender 42.4
Gravity 50.3
Splatting 48.7
39% 47.1 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AGI512G16AI198 512GB
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 929 757 895 557 501 351 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 1,177
Write 1,056
Mixed 783
SusWrite 665
206% 920 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 24.1
165% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 724
DQ Write 637
DQ Mixed 438
395% 600 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 165%
Great: 236%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
497GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 88 85 86 86 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 107
Write 100
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 85.4
66% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.6
154% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
82.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 23.1
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 26.5
72% 25 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NH50_70RA Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Aftershock NH50_70RA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback