AZW SER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAZW SER  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW SER
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220324
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJul 08 '22 at 08:56
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 49
1-Core 135
2-Core 214
71% 133 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 519
57% 452 Pts
64-Core 873
54% 873 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
11% Very poor
Lighting 11.9
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 22.8
10% 15.7 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 18.1
Splatting 19.1
14% 16.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 648 628 670 503 41 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 1,209
Write 595
Mixed 710
SusWrite 421
163% 734 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 29.9
124% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 60.4
DQ Mixed 132
112% 171 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 120%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFS832A.C8FB 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
66.1% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 24.7
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 13.6
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SER Builds (Compare 798 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: AZW SER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback