Lenovo 20NES0FJ00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20NES0FJ00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20NES0FJ00
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220126
Uptime8 Days
Run DateJul 08 '22 at 07:17
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 53.1
1-Core 99.3
2-Core 161
58% 104 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 509
47% 394 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Legend(17AA 5124) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.40.06
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 12.6
Reflection 12.6
Parallax 18.4
10% 14.5 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 14.3
Splatting 12.2
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GB
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1387 1326 1313 1348 1296 1321 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 1,591
Write 1,286
Mixed 1,140
SusWrite 1,332
300% 1,337 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 53.8
176% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 774
DQ Write 459
DQ Mixed 659
479% 631 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 227%
Great: 347%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
449GB free
Firmware: AM002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 113 115 115 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 113
Write 104
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 114
66% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905663-030.A00G Hynix HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.6% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 26.9
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 22.4
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20NES0FJ00 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20NES0FJ00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback