Notebook P870KM_KM1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive330% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemNotebook P870KM_KM1  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P870KM_KM1
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170711
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 07 '22 at 22:32
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 128
2-Core 253
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 698
74% 589 Pts
64-Core 688
43% 688 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 0876) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 66% Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
869GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4CR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1991 2166 2196 2251 2264 2253 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
330% Outstanding
Read 1,710
Write 2,365
Mixed 1,621
SusWrite 2,187
447% 1,971 MB/s
4K Read 55.3
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 72.7
241% 82.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,390
DQ Write 1,030
DQ Mixed 1,191
895% 1,204 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 330%
Great: 370%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
445GB free
Firmware: SBK2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 77 82 80 85 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 45.3
Write 69.9
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 80.6
46% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.4
148% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 029E CMSO16GX4M1A2133C15 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 26.4
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 27.5
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 59.9
67% 59.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P870KM_KM1 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

System: Notebook P870KM_KM1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $307
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback