TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell XPS 8500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemDell XPS 8500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0NW73C
Memory20.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '22 at 20:45
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 102
2-Core 198
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 493
53% 422 Pts
64-Core 508
31% 508 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 74.5%
 Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217
MSI(1462 3822) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Lighting 70.3
Reflection 68.2
Parallax 101
57% 79.8 fps
MRender 56.2
Gravity 84.4
Splatting 43.7
49% 61.4 fps
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 54.4%
 Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT2000X6SSD8 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 417 418 437 441 441 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 451
Write 414
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 379
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 16.8
4K Mixed 0.4
38% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 26.7
DQ Mixed 0.4
24% 62.2 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 55.4%
 Great: 84%
CT2000X6SSD8 2TB
94GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 228 232 239 240 241 MB/s
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.6% Good
Read 254
Write 232
Mixed 230
SusWrite 233
54% 237 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 22.7
90% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 39.9
73% 145 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 60.6%
 Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 162 158 163 167 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 81.2
Write 101
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 161
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.5
211% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 69.9%
 Great: 90%
WD WD80EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 186 186 188 189 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 189
Mixed 95.5
SusWrite 188
121% 165 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.1
308% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 109%
 Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU7BFR8A-PB HMT41GU7BFR8A-PB HMT351U6CFR8C-PB HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.5% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 11.4
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 33.5%
 Great: 57%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical XPS 8500 Builds (Compare 2,116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8500

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples1,680x
Core i5-3450Intel  $59Bench 66%, 34,199 samples144x
Core i5-3350PIntel  $60Bench 65%, 21,413 samples139x
GPU
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples164x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples155x
GeForce GT 620NvidiaBench 2%, 17,163 samples112x
SSD
PM830 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 63%, 9,379 samples58x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples57x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples56x
RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples156x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples81x
NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 4x4GBNanyaBench 58%, 1,608 samples77x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback