Asus P5K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5K  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '22 at 20:26
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
43.5% Average
Memory 61
1-Core 38.9
2-Core 77.9
38% 59.3 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 156
20% 154 Pts
64-Core 155
10% 155 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 1D01) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Lighting 16.5
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 18
13% 17.2 fps
MRender 15.2
Gravity 18.3
Splatting 16.1
14% 16.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 120GB-$50
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 82 84 78 88 85 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.5% Average
Read 245
Write 236
Mixed 196
SusWrite 95.1
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 29.2
101% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 29.5
DQ Write 82.1
DQ Mixed 37.2
34% 49.6 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 89%
Seagate ST380817AS 80GB-$130
74GB free
Firmware: 3.42
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 56 55 56 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 45.5
Write 14
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 55.7
28% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 32%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
110GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 145 150 126 67 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 168
Write 159
Mixed 88.9
SusWrite 113
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
248% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 109%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
275GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 32.1
Write 25.9
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 17.3
18% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
110GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 92 90 91 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 91.8
Write 97.6
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 90.3
63% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 60%
HTS54101 0G9AT00 100GB
69GB free, PID 0641
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 15 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 29.6
Write 24.1
Mixed 17.1
SusWrite 15.7
28% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 5.1
16% 5.47 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 5
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5K Builds (Compare 358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K - $399

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $619
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback