Dell Precision M4700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision M4700  (all builds)
MotherboardDell
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '22 at 17:05
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 85%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 73.1
1-Core 82.8
2-Core 114
56% 89.9 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 469
42% 357 Pts
64-Core 479
30% 479 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1000M
Dell(1028 153E) 2GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.16
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.42% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 4.5
3% 4.57 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 5
Splatting 4.5
4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.42%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$66
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 347 339 320 312 305 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 323
Write 317
Mixed 290
SusWrite 324
71% 313 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 31.8
103% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 34.7
DQ Write 94.3
DQ Mixed 49.5
42% 59.5 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8C-PB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 17.3
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.3
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision M4700 Builds (Compare 467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision M4700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback