TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Aftershock N95TP6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAftershock N95TP6  (all builds)
MotherboardAftershock N95TP6
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180131
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 07 '22 at 16:38
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 82.1
1-Core 120
2-Core 244
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 712
74% 595 Pts
64-Core 708
44% 708 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 85.4%
 Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 951B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1659
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Lighting 64.5
Reflection 73.7
Parallax 64.6
53% 67.6 fps
MRender 66.7
Gravity 63.5
Splatting 64.4
53% 64.9 fps
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 52.7%
 Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria G2 SSD 1TB
566GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFA17.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1189 679 683 688 688 691 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 1,175
Write 1,608
Mixed 1,170
SusWrite 770
267% 1,181 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 65
220% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,556
DQ Write 1,280
DQ Mixed 1,353
1,031% 1,397 MB/s
Poor: 132% ↑
This bench: 225%
 Great: 251%
Klevv NEO N600 M.2 120GB
16GB free
Firmware: Q0921B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 63 58 51 64 58 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.6% Good
Read 264
Write 104
Mixed 157
SusWrite 94.8
34% 155 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 78.1
4K Mixed 34.9
122% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 93.7
DQ Mixed 228
157% 199 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 62.6%
 Great: 101%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
729GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 81 89 88 90 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 126
Write 121
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 85.7
65% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.3
98% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 60.9%
 Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 23.2
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 23.9
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 81.4%
 Great: 97%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical N95TP6 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Aftershock N95TP6

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel  $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples5x
Core i5-8400Intel  $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples4x
GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples5x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples4x
SSD
NEO N600 M.2 120GBKlevvBench 78%, 166 samples3x
120GB M.2 SSD 120GBAftershockBench 49%, 84 samples3x
G2 SSD 1TBKioxia-exceriaBench 198%, 4,329 samples1x
RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples4x
IM48GS88N26-GIIHA0 1x8GBUnknownBench 39%, 100 samples3x
CT16G4SFRA266.C8FE 2x16GBCrucialBench 77%, 1,235 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $186
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback