Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515FAC_X515FA

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.68% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

22 months ago, 22 months ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515FAC_X515FA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X515FAC
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210708
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '22 at 18:38
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	7%
CPU Throttled	83%

PC Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10110U 11,481 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Memory 76.5 1-Core 123 2-Core 134 68% 111 Pts	4-Core 291 8-Core 280 38% 285 Pts	64-Core 283 18% 283 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 110,580 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1D6C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	5.68% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 4.6 Parallax 6.8 5% 5.8 fps	MRender 7.9 Gravity 5.8 Splatting 11.6 7% 8.43 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.68% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3256B-AB1 256GB 738 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: EDFK0SA6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 721 594 313 318 315 322 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	163% Outstanding	Read 900 Write 1,159 Mixed 1,059 SusWrite 430 200% 887 MB/s	4K Read 45.9 4K Write 162 4K Mixed 71.2 247% 93.2 MB/s	DQ Read 597 DQ Write 487 DQ Mixed 569 419% 551 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 163% Great: 193%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 931GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 133 134 132 132 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Read 122 Write 120 Mixed 71.2 SusWrite 130 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 2x4GB 26,749 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.1% Very good	MC Read 24.8 MC Write 31.5 MC Mixed 22.4 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 35.9 SC Mixed 25.3 75% 26.3 GB/s	Latency 87.3 46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515FAC_X515FA Builds (Compare 192 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515FAC_X515FA

CPU
Core i3-10110UIntelBench 47%, 11,481 samples	163x
Core i5-10210UIntelBench 53%, 54,859 samples	29x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 110,580 samples	192x

SSD
OM8PDP3256B-AB1 256GBKingstonBench 116%, 738 samples	92x
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples	24x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	23x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CWE M471A5244BB0-CWE 8GBSamsungBench 62%, 1,146 samples	74x
M471A5244CB0-CWE 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 12,631 samples	49x
HMAA1GS6CJR6N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 30%, 25 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16