Asus SABERTOOTH Z87

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics166% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 23 months ago.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH Z87  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130626
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 06 '22 at 05:23
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 197
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 513
52% 422 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Lighting 246
Reflection 218
Parallax 216
201% 227 fps
MRender 256
Gravity 166
Splatting 134
146% 185 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 166%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 259 242 218 201 189 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 360
Write 347
Mixed 344
SusWrite 236
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 49
163% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 237
178% 238 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 133%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$39
120GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 65 64 62 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 94.5
Write 83.5
Mixed 76
SusWrite 63.7
59% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 0420 F3-2400C10-4GZH 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 0420 F3-2400C10-4GZH 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
48.7% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 16.5
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH Z87 Builds (Compare 1,562 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH Z87 - $193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $685
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback