Toshiba SATELLITE L50-B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE L50-B  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 05 '22 at 16:57
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
43.2% Average
Memory 67.2
1-Core 42.9
2-Core 74.5
41% 61.5 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 123
15% 118 Pts
64-Core 106
7% 106 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 F920) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.59% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 5.3
2% 5.8 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 4
3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.59%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Yruis SSDSCE880/240GB 240GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c75
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 36 8.6 21 32 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 337
Write 136
Mixed 271
SusWrite 28.7
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 22.2
80% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 89.7
DQ Mixed 81.2
69% 103 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 82%
Marshal MAL2500SA-T54L 500GB
166GB free
Firmware: AM0P2D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 79 81 79 80 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 64.3
Write 72.2
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 78.9
45% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.7% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 16
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 12.1
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE L50-B Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L50-B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback