Lenovo 80VR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemLenovo 80VR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '22 at 10:56
Run Duration298 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 83
1-Core 112
2-Core 198
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 579
57% 468 Pts
64-Core 568
35% 568 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 38E1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6589
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.1% Average
Lighting 59.3
Reflection 71.1
Parallax 60.7
48% 63.7 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 59
Splatting 62.1
51% 61.8 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFS128GD9MND-551 128GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20400A00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 206 205 148 104 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 598
Write 208
Mixed 302
SusWrite 160
70% 317 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 30.8
116% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 277
208% 283 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 82%
Great: 98%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
920GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 109 112 112 113 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 139
Write 81
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 110
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.7
212% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 72%
Great: 79%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
426GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 79 79 78 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 70.6
Write 82.9
Mixed 50
SusWrite 78.6
97% 70.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MH78HAF-2666 Kingston 99U5700-027.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
73.6% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 21.5
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 20.4
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80VR Builds (Compare 1,487 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Lenovo 80VR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback