Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	70.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	98.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Tarox Midrange Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK PRIME Z390M-PLUS
Memory	59 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191024
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 05 '22 at 07:18
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	99.6% Outstanding	Memory 90.4 1-Core 132 2-Core 291 93% 171 Pts	4-Core 583 8-Core 1,109 101% 846 Pts	64-Core 1,155 72% 1,155 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 99.6% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000 12,628 User benchmarks, average bench 67% Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 462.96 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Lighting 83.2 Reflection 93.2 Parallax 86.3 68% 87.6 fps	MRender 89.4 Gravity 92.1 Splatting 95.8 76% 92.4 fps
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 70%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 168GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 307 309 304 304 302 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	98.5% Outstanding	Read 493 Write 351 Mixed 299 SusWrite 306 81% 362 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 92.5 4K Mixed 38.1 145% 53.9 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 256 218% 320 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 98.5% Great: 129%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 343GB free Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 723 869 894 898 898 905 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	198% Outstanding	Read 1024 Write 934 Mixed 879 SusWrite 865 208% 926 MB/s	4K Read 54.7 4K Write 149 4K Mixed 71.4 253% 91.6 MB/s	DQ Read 329 DQ Write 856 DQ Mixed 221 275% 468 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 198% Great: 209%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB 11,405 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 4GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 25 23 19 25 22 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	Read 92.2 Write 31.8 Mixed 51.5 SusWrite 21.8 58% 49.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.8 105% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8266.C16FP CT16G4DFD8266.C16FD1 CT16G4DFD8266.C16FP CT16G4DFD8266.M16FJ 64GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2733, 2733, 2733, 2733 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	94.3% Outstanding	MC Read 33.8 MC Write 36.8 MC Mixed 30.1 96% 33.6 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 38.6 SC Mixed 29.8 85% 29.8 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 94%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 67%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 61%

Destroyer

GPU
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	4x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	2x
Quadro K2000DNvidiaBench 8%, 1,102 samples	1x

SSD
760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $4Bench 228%, 10,188 samples	3x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	3x
Extreme Pro 480GBSanDisk $199Bench 93%, 9,250 samples	1x

RAM
CT16G4DFD8266.C16FP CT16G4DFD8266.C16FP CT16G4DFD8266.C16FD1 CT16G4DFD8266.M16FJ 64GBCrucialBench 81%, 2 samples	2x
16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 4x8GBMicronBench 58%, 1,895 samples	1x
CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR1 4x8GBCrucialBench 74%, 293 samples	1x

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $283

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16