Fujitsu LIFEBOOK A544

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK A544  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNBB35
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170405
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '22 at 01:19
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 85%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
On Board, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 66.8
2-Core 159
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 440
42% 344 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 17A9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 6.7
3% 4.33 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 154 88 86 88 89 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.7% Above average
Read 173
Write 97.9
Mixed 162
SusWrite 119
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 26.2
100% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 141
111% 152 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KNG/4G Hynix HMT451S6MFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.6% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 16.4
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 16.9
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK A544 Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK A544

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback