Dell OptiPlex 3010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell OptiPlex 3010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 3010  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024x768x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '22 at 17:08
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 79.7
1-Core 78.5
2-Core 133
59% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 230
30% 228 Pts
64-Core 223
14% 223 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 20.9
Parallax 18.8
17% 20.4 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 19
Splatting 17.3
14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 126 115 122 127 175 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.6% Below average
Read 174
Write 112
Mixed 132
SusWrite 136
31% 139 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 27.9
4K Mixed 17.1
68% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 36.6
DQ Write 38.2
DQ Mixed 33.2
26% 36 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
466GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 131 129 132 132 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 121
Write 125
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 130
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 69%
Jmicron Generic 500GB
102GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 28 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 32.9
Write 25.7
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 28.9
20% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 M378B5773QB0-CK0 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.3% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 3010 Builds (Compare 4,339 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 3010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback