Intel H55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics45.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardIntel H55  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141225
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 03 '22 at 23:01
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$339
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 79.5
1-Core 81.8
2-Core 142
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 200
27% 201 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45.3% Average
Lighting 56.5
Reflection 58.9
Parallax 53.4
46% 56.3 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 49.9
Splatting 48.1
44% 54.6 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 208 212 225 227 229 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.2% Good
Read 258
Write 232
Mixed 190
SusWrite 214
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 28.6
101% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 170
134% 185 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 128%
Seagate Ultra Slim GD 1TB
607GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 17 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 28.4
Write 29.2
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 17.7
19% 25 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 68%
WD Elements 25A3 3TB
724GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 27.9
Write 25.2
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 15.8
31% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
123% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
33.5% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 10.6
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11.7
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H55 Builds (Compare 2,088 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $70
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback