Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 179%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 234%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics215% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory53.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '22 at 06:13
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 68.9
1-Core 140
2-Core 280
87% 163 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 1,112
99% 836 Pts
64-Core 2,813
174% 2,813 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,135
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB; FE 3090
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
215% Outstanding
Lighting 321
Reflection 297
Parallax 330
261% 316 fps
MRender 350
Gravity 256
Splatting 188
208% 265 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 215%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct1000mx 50 1TB
222GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,124
Write 5,840
Mixed 6,284
1,429% 6,416 MB/s
4K Read 429
4K Write 373
4K Mixed 391
1,348% 397 MB/s
DQ Read 1,214
DQ Write 1,060
DQ Mixed 1,144
856% 1,139 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 121%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
150GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 131 134 135 136 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 116
Write 102
Mixed 40
SusWrite 134
71% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 107%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 131 131 128 129 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 113
Write 144
Mixed 108
SusWrite 129
92% 124 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.7
438% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 94%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 145 148 148 149 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 66.5
Write 86.2
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 146
69% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.5
199% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 94%
WD WD4000BEVT-00ZAT 400GB
105GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 41 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
27% Poor
Read 53.5
Write 52.7
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 40.2
34% 46.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27%
Great: 41%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB
122GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 35
Write 33.8
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 35.5
44% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C18-32GTZR 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83% Excellent
MC Read 30
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 31.9
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 28.6
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,089 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,007
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback