Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP hAXOR.sUXOR.sOXOR (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI 2A90h
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100303
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Jul 03 '22 at 03:32
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	Memory 69.4 1-Core 80.8 2-Core 142 58% 97.3 Pts	4-Core 215 8-Core 302 32% 258 Pts	64-Core 244 15% 244 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188 42,397 User benchmarks, average bench 16% MSI(1462 2327) 1GB CLim: 832 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	16% Very poor	Lighting 18.6 Reflection 32.6 Parallax 18 15% 23.1 fps	MRender 27.5 Gravity 20.9 Splatting 18.2 18% 22.2 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 210 217 201 222 207 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	56.5% Above average	Read 209 Write 215 Mixed 188 SusWrite 209 46% 205 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 41.5 4K Mixed 24.2 87% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 192 144% 192 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 17GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 214 183 137 107 98 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59% Above average	Read 250 Write 232 Mixed 233 SusWrite 156 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 47.3 4K Mixed 29.9 99% 33.5 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 187 142% 192 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 134%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$20 89,637 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 95GB free Firmware: SC13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 80 81 66 84 80 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	44.7% Average	Read 79.4 Write 92.2 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 76.1 54% 73.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 9905403-198.A00LF 2x4GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	18.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 5.8 16% 5.7 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 5.7 17% 5.93 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	4x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	4x

RAM
KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9801AD80 KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9801AD80 9905403-198.A00LF 9801AD80 9905403-198.A00LF 16GBUnknownBench 38%, 5 samples	3x
9905403-198.A00LF 2x4GBUnknownBench 23%, 8 samples	1x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $194

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16